Fundamentally Flawed GOP Ideologies


Posted by Cynic | Posted in Cynicism, Philosophy, Politics, States | Posted on 08-01-2012

I commit thought crimesThe fundamental, basic attitudes in the current GOP candidates are flawed right from the start. They see the people as slaves to do their bidding, rather than government as the servant of the people. Rick Santorum illustrates this ideology:

We need someone who will… motivate the American public to do its duty. (Source)

So, the people need to do their duty? What about the government? This is a fundamentally flawed outlook that I don’t think anyone can really support, except for those that want to be slaves.

“Motivate”? I wonder if he meant “force”. “To do its duty”? I wonder if he meant “into slavery”.

The only legitimate state is the state that serves its people. Whenever those roles are reversed, it is the DUTY of the people to revolt and overthrow the state.

This is the purpose of the 2nd amendment. It is to keep a degree of power, in the form of potential violence, in the hands of the people so that they have the ability to overthrow an oppressive state, a state that demands that the people serve the state.



Sources of Morality


Posted by Cynic | Posted in Cynicism, Logic, Philosophy | Posted on 25-12-2011


Yin and Yang love and hate moral and immoralWell, it’s Christmas, and it occurred to me that “what is right” and “what is wrong” are far too often more shades of gray than anything else.

One of the only remotely sensible options is Immanuel Kant’s Categorical Imperative. This has problems though, with the most often cited problem running along these lines:

You’re living in Nazi Germany and are harbouring Jews to save them. A Nazi officer knocks at your door and asks if you have any Jews inside. You can lie or tell the truth. If you lie, you’ve violated the Categorical Imperative that you not lie. If you tell the truth, the Jews will die.

There’s no good solution to the dilemma there. You’re damned either way.

I think I’ve come up with a reasonable, although simple, solution to the moral problem. I’m not flushing out some details here as they’re mostly details, e.g. we’re assuming that you’re sane and rational, and not completely crazy. I’m also ignoring the actual action, as I don’t think that the action is really all that important. We’re talking about the morality of actions, and so any action will do. Also, I’m ignoring acts that are neither moral nor immoral, e.g. deciding whether to have an apple or banana with  lunch.

All acts that originate in love are moral.
All acts that originate in hate are immoral.

It’s simple, elegant, and I haven’t thought of anything yet that is a problem for it.

Here’s a test with a typical example used in philosophy classes in university:

A group of people are trying to escape from a repressive police state. They’re near the border, but hiding until they can run across to freedom. Among them is a young woman with an infant. The infant begins to cry. The young woman tries to comfort the infant, but it doesn’t stop. The guards will hear if she doesn’t quiet the infant, and everyone will die. She covers the infants mouth… but the only solution is to suffocate it or they will all be caught and killed. She suffocates the infant and saves everyone from the guards.

It’s a horrid thing to kill your own child. Under the Categorical Imperative, she’s committed a sin. But really, can we blame her? Can we say that she sinned? That’s very difficult to do. She has saved everyone she is with, at a terrible cost to herself. Her act comes out of love for the people with her, and not from a place of hate.

Those that love laws won’t like this at all. But then again, I didn’t say this was about laws. I said it was about right and wrong.

Anyways, I humbly submit this as a different way to look at right, wrong, morality, and immorality.

Peace and Merry Christmas,



Is God on Your Side?


Posted by Cynic | Posted in Cynicism, Philosophy, Religion | Posted on 13-12-2011

Ahem… He’s probably got better things to do than take sides.

God on your side

And why is it that it’s always people with guns or people that are fighting that insist “God” is on their side?

Dog Favicon for the Cynics and Diogenes of Sinope


Posted by Cynic | Posted in Cynicism, Philosophy | Posted on 03-01-2011

Tags: ,

Diogenes looking for an honest manI’ve added a favicon to (It’s the dog icon you see in the address bar.) But it’s not random and not without significance. I chose it because the word “cynic” comes from the Greek word for “dog”, and “Diogenes the Dog”, or Diogenes of Sinope, is my favorite philosopher.

Credited as one of the fathers of classical Cynicism, Diogenes is an important figure in philosophy, and definitely one of the most colorful. He’s also probably about the only person to lip off to Alexander the Great and live.

More, Diogenes is the one who coined the word “cosmopolitan”. When asked what city he was a citizen of, he responded, “I am a citizen of the world (cosmopolites).”

In the picture on the right Diogenes is searching during the day with a lantern through the marketplace for an honest man. I can’t help but think of chapter 125 of the Gay Science where Nietzsche writes about the madman who took a lantern through the marketplace yelling, “I seek God! I seek God!” and, “God is dead.” I would be truly surprised if Nietzsche had not read “The Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers” by Diogenes Laertius where many accounts of Diogenes of Sinope are found.

The modern idea of “cynicism” is nothing like classical Cynicism. While I can’t really subscribe to the whole “no wealth or property” thing in the classical version, much of their philosophy is still good and relevant for today.

More on the Cynics at a later time though.