Why Rich People Should Do Less Time in Prison Than Poor People

0

Posted by Cynic | Posted in Anarchism / Voluntaryism, Logic, Philosophy, Stupid Questions | Posted on 18-04-2014

Tags: , ,

V is for VoluntaryRich people should do less prison time for the same crimes compared to poor people. Here’s why.

In the modern world, you must pay taxes or you go to prison.

If tax is not theft, then the government owns a percentage of the results/rewards/consequences of your labour/time.

In other words, you are not solely responsible for the consequences of your actions. The government assumes a percentage of the rewards/consequences of your actions through tax. (If they could take your smiles and laughs, I’m sure they would.)

However, different people pay different rates of tax, depending on how much they earn.

For example, someone making a little may pay 25% of the fruits of their labour to the government as tax, whereas someone who earns much more may pay 75% of what they earn to the government.

In both cases the government steps in to assume ownership or responsibility for a percentage.

Now, if two people in different tax brackets commit the same crime, would it not make sense for the government to be consistent in its role of assuming the consequences of people’s actions, e.g. the rewards of the fruits of people’s labours (consequences of their actions), should they not equally assume that same responsibility for negative consequences?

On a 10 year prison sentence, it would then be just for the poor person in the 25% tax bracket to only do 7.5 years in prison (25% belongs to the state), whereas it would be most just for the wealthy person in the 75% tax bracket to do a maximum of 2.5 years in prison (75% belongs to the state).

Rich people should be less accountable than poor people under the law because the law works by percentages, and everyone must be treated equally under the law according to the rule of law. Of percentages. Because logic. Errr… science… err…

Ahem…

Or maybe tax is just slavery by a percentage, and that’s the problem that should be dealt with, and the only way for the rule of law to be upheld is for NOBODY to take what doesn’t belong to them whether it be a percentage or an entirety.

On What Planet is it OK to Use Violence in Large Groups?

0

Posted by Cynic | Posted in Philosophy, Politics, Stupid Questions | Posted on 10-11-2012

On what planet is it OK to use violence in large groups by proxy, but not OK to use violence individually and directly?

Answer: Earth

Government *is* violence. Today, most laws are violent.

Stupid Questions: Heathens, Atheists and Agnostics

3

Posted by Cynic | Posted in Stupid Questions | Posted on 01-04-2011

Question markIs it possible to be a devout heathen or a devout atheist or a devout agnostic?

Stupid Questions: A Pound of Cure

0

Posted by Cynic | Posted in Stupid Questions | Posted on 29-03-2011

If an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, then if you need an undelete utility, wouldn’t it be better to have cut off your fingers to start with?

Stupid Questions: Finding the Flying Spaghetti Monster

0

Posted by Cynic | Posted in Stupid Questions | Posted on 25-03-2011

FSMI’ve been wanting to do this for a while: Post really stupid questions. The kind of complete idiocy that you just can’t answer. I’ll only have 1 question per post, but here goes with #1!

How many people in prison find the Flying Spaghetti Monster instead of Jesus?